Bernie Ecclestone to be charged with tax fraud

The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) says it will charge Bernie Ecclestone with fraud by false representation following an HMRC investigation codenamed Operation Gallic.

The charge against the 91-year-old “relates to his failure to declare to HMRC the existence of assets held overseas believed to be worth in excess of £400m”, said Andrew Penhale, Chief Crown Prosecutor for the CPS Serious Economic Organised and International Directorate, which was launched earlier this year.

Simon York, Director of HMRC’s Fraud Investigation Service stated that the charge “follows a complex and worldwide criminal investigation”.

Ecclestone was the head of Formula 1 for 40 years until 2017, where he amassed a multibillion-pound fortune.

His case will be heard at Westminster Magistrates Court, with the first hearing set for Monday 22nd August.

Ecclestone has now made headlines three months in a row – in June, his interview on ITV’s Good Morning Britain was widely reported for comments Ecclestone made about Vladimir Putin and Ukraine; in May, Ecclestone was arrested for illegally carrying an undocumented gun in his luggage while boarding a private plane in Brazil.

Fraud investigations by ESA Risk

If you suspect that a fraud has occurred within your business and need advice or support on the next steps, we’re here to help.

Contact Mike Wright, Risk Management & Investigations Consultant, at mike.wright@esarisk.com, on +44 (0)343 515 8686 or via our contact form, to find out more.

Insolvency Service continues push to address misuse of Covid support schemes

The Insolvency Service has announced the latest punishments handed out to two directors who abused Covid-19 financial support.

These are two in a string of recent announcements (see News from 27th June, 23rd June, 22nd June, 20th June and 7th June), with official data from the Insolvency Service further illustrating the extent of their work in this area over recent weeks and months.

Of the 99 director disqualification outcomes published in Q1 of the 2022/23 financial year, nearly 40% of them mention Covid-19 support schemes. The most cited pandemic-related conduct being abuse of the Bounce Back Loan Scheme (in 37 disqualification outcome summaries).

And the Bounce Back Loan Scheme (BBLS) was at the heart of Grigorijs Hacaturjancs’ ten-year disqualification announced at the end of last week. The director of online retailer Beauty&Melody Shop Ltd (not connected to a chain of salons in London with the same name) applied for, and obtained, a £50,000 loan from the BBLS in May 2020. Three issues with this application have since been highlighted:

  1. The company was ineligible for the scheme as an online-only retailer, i.e. a business that wasn’t directly affected by coronavirus-related restrictions.
  2. Beauty&Melody Shop Ltd had ceased trading more than a year before the application was made.
  3. Hacaturjancs “inflated the company’s turnover on the BBL application in order to secure the maximum £50,000 available through the scheme.”

Furthermore, the company then made “a payment of nearly £50,000” to a Slovakian business, two weeks after receiving the loan monies. While Hacaturjancs described this as a payment to a supplier, there was no evidence that the two companies had ever done business together before, and Beauty&Melody “received no goods or services in return for the payment.”

The other case reported by the Insolvency Service on 1st July also involved an £18,000 loan from the BBLS, as well as a £25,000 local council grant. Rathudi Mahesh Manglanand is now subject to a nine-year bankruptcy restrictions undertaking, after admitting he spent most of the funding on alcohol and gambling.

The sole trader, from Pontypridd, ran a restaurant in Cardiff, which ceased trading before the Covid-19 pandemic. This didn’t stop Manglanand from successfully applying for a £25,000 grant in April 2020 and an £18,000 loan a month later.

Manglanand told Insolvency Service investigators that “he had lost around £30,000 through gambling in the space of a year.”

The restrictions placed upon him came into effect on 20th June 2022. Hacaturjancs’ disqualification is effective from 12th July 2022.

In both cases, the individuals had voluntarily entered into insolvency proceedings – Hacaturjancs placed his company into voluntary liquidation in July 2021; Manglanand applied for his own bankruptcy in the same month – which triggered investigations by the Insolvency Service. The current assessment by the liquidator is “that Hacaturjancs has no personal assets”, while “the Official Receiver is assessing assets available” in Manglanand’s case.

These announcements at the beginning of July suggest that the pace of the response to Covid support scheme abuse we saw in Q1 will continue in the second quarter.

Insolvency and debt investigations

Seeing the whole picture in insolvency and debt cases is key to maximising returns to creditors. For more information on how ESA Risk can help to identify hidden assets or locate targets who have gone to ground, contact Mike Wright, Investigations and Risk Management Consultant, at mike.wright@esarisk.com, on +44 (0)343 515 8686 or via our contact form.

You can also learn more from our Insolvency & Debt Investigations brochure:

 

 

Know Your Customer: An investigative approach

The cause? These businesses allegedly violated UK social responsibility and anti-money laundering laws.

Anti-money laundering (AML) laws regulate a wide range of institutions in addition to casinos.

The laws aim to prevent illegal financial activity by mandating security measures – including the automatic investigation of agents involved in transactions with high money laundering potential.

One of these mandates is the ‘Know Your Customer’ or ‘KYC’ standard.

But what is Know Your Customer?

Know Your Customer (KYC) is a standard set of procedures designed to mitigate legal risks through investigation. In this guide, discover what KYC is in detail, how it works, and how effective KYC compliance can empower your organisation.

KYC: Know Your Customer (overview)

It is difficult to overstate the importance of KYC. It is a standard enshrined both in law and in the financial industry. It enables effective measurement of risk tolerance, financial position, and investment knowledge.

All of this should inform a financial advisor’s investment strategy for a given client – and whether it’s wise to take that person (or organisation) on as a client at all.

What does KYC mean?

KYC is an initialism that stands for ‘Know Your Customer’. The KYC standard outlines a set of processes and procedures applicable institutions must comply with.

These processes share the aim of developing a complete profile of an individual or institution trying to invest or transfer significant monetary sums.

What is the purpose of KYC?

The immediate purpose of KYC procedures is the development of a profile of high-risk customers.

It sets parameters for additional verification of high-risk individuals as they become clients of financial institutions. It also requires the verification of any beneficial owners of properties, businesses or organisations in their role as clients.

This profile is a tool to keep track of high-risk individuals, so law enforcement can effectively prevent money laundering, bribery and financial crimes against the state.

The risks KYC works to mitigate are potential threats to the individual, community and state. These are the risks that a financial transaction:

  • may facilitate crime.
  • may illegally disguise offshore accounts to evade taxation.
  • may subvert legal or democratic processes through bribery.

Who is most affected by KYC regulations?

In the UK, anti-money laundering (AML) and anti-bribery laws primarily target those whose wealth, power or status makes them more likely to engage in illegal financial transactions. Those most affected include:

  • High-value customers (HVCs)
  • Politically exposed persons (PEPs)
  • People with significant control (PSCs) of companies.

An HVC is a client whose account makes a significant impact on a company’s bottom line. A PEP is someone entrusted with public office or someone who serves a public function.

A PSC is someone who owns and controls a company or organisation. People with significant control must be registered with the PSC database in the United Kingdom.

What does ‘enhanced due diligence’ mean in the context of KYC?

Enhanced due diligence, or EDD, is a detailed risk assessment of a customer. The results of the risk assessment are compiled into a report. Know Your Customer analysts perform these assessments and write these reports.

Which industries must comply with Know Your Customer regulations?

In any industry where significant monetary transactions are commonplace, there’s a greater risk of money laundering and financial crimes. Organisations that must comply with UK KYC regulations include:

  • Financial institutions
  • Real estate agencies
  • Payment processing companies
  • Gaming and gambling spaces
  • Solicitors and law firms
  • High-value dealers (auctioneers, etc.).

KYC standards are also built into other regulations and laws.

For example, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) in the UK and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the US require pharmaceutical manufacturers to maintain current good manufacturing practices (CGMPs), which incorporate KYC processes.

What do Know Your Customer checks entail?

There are four aspects of Know Your Customer assessments. These are:

  1. Corporate document investigation
  2. Identity evaluation
  3. Strategic intelligence-gathering
  4. Analysis and reporting.

The specific requirements and procedures for each element vary by the nature and nationality of the customer in question.

Investigate corporate financial and legal documentation

A KYC check will examine certain legal documents for veracity and consistency. The Ministry of Housing, Communities, and Local Government published guidance on the KYC standard – as applied to corporate and organisational clients – in 2016.

It notes the necessary and acceptable documents for verification, which differ for UK-based companies and non-UK companies.

Evaluate proof of identity (individual)

KYC assessments verify identity with ID documents. These can include:

  • Full UK passport that has the machine-readable zone
  • Full photo card driving licence
  • Photo card (national identity card) that has the machine-readable zone.

Strategies

Know Your Customer analysts use a range of strategies to gather information. They also utilise computing and software tools to aid investigations into customer risk and potential money laundering.

These tools can be open-source intelligence-gathering programmes. Or, they might be sophisticated data analytics tools.

Today, KYC analysts can even perform due diligence extensively by searching the dark web. These searches are powered by machine learning algorithms that recognise patterns of behaviour.

How does a Know Your Customer analyst enhance due diligence?

A Know Your Customer analyst enhances due diligence throughout the life of the customer-institution relationship. Applicable organisations typically standardise reviews of all new customer accounts, to ensure KYC compliance.

Analysts also periodically re-evaluate high-risk accounts. This involves compiling a list of transactions, and then analysing associated risk factors, which include:

  • Analysis of unexpected activities.
  • Verification of the source of funds.
  • Verification of use of funds.
  • Identification and assessment of risks inherent to:
    • Products and services
    • All entities involved in the transaction
    • Geographic location.

Finally, KYC analysts observe and record trends in customer behaviour, and they investigate notably suspicious activity. Analysis of customer behaviour factors in general market trends, and a KYC analyst will note those.

Know Your Customer risk and compliance analysis

An organisation may hire a KYC analyst to assess its own risk of KYC non-compliance. The analyst may evaluate on organisation’s policies, security, and new customer processes.

Then, the analyst can compile a report. This can empower an organisation to develop thorough risk-mitigation and security processes. KYC risk reports can facilitate an investigation, and some – though certainly not all – are available to the public.

Protect your organisation with KYC

Ultimately, Know Your Customer checks keep financial institutions, high-value dealers and other agents involved in large-scale monetary transactions safer. KYC checks keep companies legal, and they protect our communities from dangerous, illegal activities.

One of the best routes to KYC is enhanced due diligence. If your organisation needs a thorough way to mitigate risks imposed by customers, use EDD services created by experts.

To find out more about ESA Risk’s Enhanced Due Diligence services, please contact Mike Wright, Risk Management and Investigations Consultant, at mike.wright@esarisk.com, on +44 (0)343 515 8686 or via our contact form. You can also find more information on our Enhanced Due Diligence page.

First criminal conviction for Bounce Back Loan fraud

The owner and sole director of a pizza takeaway in Manchester has been sentenced to two years in prison for fraudulently obtaining a Bounce Back Loan during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Abdulrazag Zagroba applied for a £20,000 loan under the Covid support scheme in June 2020, two weeks after applying to dissolve his company Amigo Pizza (Manchester) Ltd.

In applying for the Bounce Back Loan, Zagroba “signed the loan declaration stating the company would be able to make repayments” and he failed to tell the lender that he had started the dissolution process.

Zagroba, 54, told investigators from the Insolvency Service that he had “no intention of using the Bounce Back Loan for the business.”

Amigo Pizza (Manchester) Ltd ran a pizza takeaway in Stretford, Manchester from January 2020 until October 2020, when the business was dissolved. The loan taken out by Zagroba became due for repayments in June 2021, when the company was no longer active.

Rather than use the funding for his takeaway business, Zagroba sent £14,000 in cash to family living abroad, with friends apparently transporting the money. He also bought and insured a car.

“Covid loans were designed to support viable businesses during the pandemic. Abdulrazag Zagroba, however, cynically sought to exploit the covid loan scheme and by dissolving his company, he intended to frustrate any attempt by the lender from taking action to recover the outstanding loan.”

Julie Barnes, Chief Investigator at the Insolvency Service

Zagroba’s sentencing on 24th June 2022 at Manchester Crown Court signalled the first successful criminal prosecution for a Bounce Back Loan fraud.

He pleaded guilty to the charges of fraud by false representation under Section 2 of the Fraud Act 2006 – which carries the 24-month prison sentence – and an aggravated striking off offence under the Companies Act 2006 (20 months’ imprisonment, to run concurrently).

As well as a two-year imprisonment, the Manchester resident has received a ban from holding company directorships for seven years.

The Insolvency Service’s Julie Barnes went on to caution that “this sentence should serve as a warning to others who engaged in this behaviour, and they should come clean and repay the money before it is too late.”

Fraud investigations by ESA Risk

If you suspect that a fraud has occurred within your business and need advice or support on the next steps, we’re here to help.

Contact Mike Wright, Risk Management & Investigations Consultant, at mike.wright@esarisk.com, on +44 (0)343 515 8686 or via our contact form, to find out more.

Two related companies wound-up after defrauding local authorities

Discreet investigations by the Insolvency Service led to two connected companies being wound-up in court on 26th April 2022 for abusing loan and grant schemes during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Momz Love Limited and Unique Homes Lettings, both with registered office addresses in South East London, defrauded multiple local authorities to take advantage of government relief packages.

The retailer, Momz Love, sold the unusual mix of “children’s clothes online and 3D printers and computing equipment from a physical shop.” The company obtained “at least £85,000” in government grants through five successful applications – with one or more further applications rejected – between June and August 2020.

Unique Homes Lettings “fraudulently claimed to be the landlord of entities”, including Momz Love, supporting the retailer’s claim that it occupied various premises used in the company’s false loan applications.

Edna Okhiria, Chief Investigator for the Insolvency Service, noted that “investigators could not find any evidence of legitimate trading by either” company.

Additionally, Unique Homes Lettings stole £8,000 or more by using “stolen cards to make payments to at least four local authorities towards business rates before asking for a refund to be paid into a different bank account.” The ‘payments’ failed, of course, leaving the local authorities paying out a “bogus refund” each time.

This was systemic fraud by both companies that continued until the Insolvency Services received complaints about the businesses.

Lynda Copson, Chief Investigator for the Insolvency Service, described the companies as being “maliciously used as vehicles to defraud local authorities across the country.”

Okhiria outlined how Momz Love used “bogus tenancy agreements to suggest the companies operated in the local area [of each local authority], as well as sham utility bills, bank statements and insurance documents.”

Both companies are now in liquidation, with the Official Receiver hoping to achieve a return for creditors.

This is the latest in a line of Covid support-related announcements made this month by the Insolvency Service, following bans for a director who abused the Eat Out to Help Out and furlough schemes, and for two directors who falsely applied for Bounce Back Loans, as well as a bankrupt being given additional restrictions for a bogus Bounce Back Loan application.

Fraud investigations by ESA Risk

If you suspect that a fraud has occurred within your business and need advice or support on the next steps, we’re here to help.

Contact Mike Wright, Risk Management & Investigations Consultant, at mike.wright@esarisk.com, on +44 (0)343 515 8686 or via our contact form, to find out more.

Bankrupt handed additional restrictions for bogus Bounce Back Loan application

Salih Ozhot, 39, has been placed under eight years of additional bankruptcy restrictions after obtaining a loan from the Bounce Back scheme for a company that had never traded.

The Official Receiver was acting as Ozhot’s trustee in bankruptcy when they found he had successfully applied for a £50,000 bounce back loan for Kangaroo Courier Services, despite the fact “the business never traded and was ineligible for government support.”

Ozhot petitioned for his bankruptcy which was declared on 13th October 2021.

He spent £15,000 of the loan on creating a website for Kangaroo Courier Services, which was apparently formed in November 2019.

The Official Receiver, Mitzi Mace, asked for Ozhot’s bankruptcy restrictions to be extended “due to the risk he posed to creditors”.

She said that “Ozhot’s actions indicated a cavalier approach to business” after he “cynically applied for government support, intended to help viable businesses during the pandemic, for a business that didn’t even exist.”

Mace is now looking to recover the loan from Ozhot’s available assets.

Ozhot’s new bankruptcy undertaking runs from 11th May 2022 for eight years and restricts him from becoming “a company director without the court’s permission” and “from being able to borrow more than £500 without disclosing his bankrupt status.”

The news comes a few days after the release of the latest corporate and individual insolvency statistics for England and Wales, which show a 23.3% year-on-year increase in personal insolvencies. May 2022’s 10,476 personal insolvencies is also 11.2% higher than April’s figure.

Responding to the statistics, Christina Fitzgerald, President of R3, the insolvency and restructuring trade body, noted that “wages haven’t kept pace with inflation, and many people remain very worried about how they’ll manage to afford food, fuel and energy as all three of these necessities become increasingly expensive.

“People’s finances have been affected by the economic fallout from the pandemic, and combined with the increased cost of living, there are potentially a lot of people who are vulnerable to the kind of unexpected shocks that can lead to them becoming insolvent.”

While the number of corporate insolvencies decreased from April to May 2022, there was a huge 79.2% increase compared to this time last year (1,817 insolvencies in May 2022, up from 1,014 in May 2021), reflecting the current uncertainty faced by businesses in a challenging market.

Insolvency and debt investigations

Seeing the whole picture in insolvency and debt cases is key to maximising returns to creditors. For more information on how ESA Risk can help to identify hidden assets or locate targets who have gone to ground, contact Mike Wright, Investigations and Risk Management Consultant, at mike.wright@esarisk.com, on +44 (0)343 515 8686 or via our contact form.

You can also learn more from our Insolvency & Debt Investigations brochure:

 

 

Two more directors disqualified for Bounce Back Loan violations

The directors of Ace Buildings and Maintenance Services Limited have been banned from running companies for 11 years, after an Insolvency Service investigation found they falsely applied for £100,000 under the Bounce Back Loan Scheme.

This is the second such announcement from the Insolvency Service in the space of two weeks – the director of a Manchester-based takeaway who abused the Eat Out to Help Out and furlough schemes was banned for seven years earlier this month.

David Harrison and Paul Hudson, from Devon, obtained a £50,000 bounce back loan in May 2020, but failed to declare that their business was in the midst of a company voluntary arrangement (CVA).

Furthermore, the directors made a second application to the scheme for another £50,000 loan, despite the fact they had already received the maximum allowance and their company was still in insolvency.

Ace Buildings and Maintenance Services Limited owed around £110,000 when it entered into a CVA in February 2020. Despite taking out the £50,000 loan, the company fell into liquidation in December of the same year “with the company stating liabilities of more than £340,000.”

That creditors voluntary liquidation (CVL) triggered an Insolvency Service investigation, which eventually led to both directors receiving disqualifications.

“11 years is a substantial amount of time to be removed from the corporate arena and their disqualifications will protect the public and creditors, while also serving as a clear warning to other rogue directors that we will robustly tackle financial misconduct”, said Mike Smith, Chief Investigator for the Insolvency Service.

Ace Buildings and Maintenance Services Limited – incorporated in June 2017 – had a short but tumultuous existence, with a winding-up petition served against the company as early as October 2019.

The company’s liquidators, KJG (part of the Xeinadin Group), are assessing ways to recover the Bounce Back Loan funds, as well as money owed to other creditors.

Smith also noted that “Bounce back loans provided a vital lifeline to help viable businesses during the pandemic. David Harrison and Paul Hudson, however, cynically applied for government support they were not entitled to when they were fully aware their company was insolvent and was not able to pay its debts.”

Harrison’s disqualification runs from 31st May 2022, and Hudson’s ban started on 9th June.

Insolvency and debt investigations

Seeing the whole picture in insolvency and debt cases is key to maximising returns to creditors. For more information on how ESA Risk can help to identify hidden assets or locate targets who have gone to ground, contact Mike Wright, Investigations and Risk Management Consultant, at mike.wright@esarisk.com, on +44 (0)343 515 8686 or via our contact form.

You can also learn more from our Insolvency & Debt Investigations brochure:

 

 

Lone worker security: Six types of lone worker security devices

You can keep your workers safe with proper training as well as lone worker security devices. Such devices can tell you your employee’s location or send a warning signal when your employee has suffered an impact or stopped moving for a given period of time.

Keep reading to learn about six types of lone worker security devices that will keep your employees safe.

What is a lone worker?

Anyone working out of reach of supervisors or colleagues qualifies as a lone worker.

Being a lone worker does not always mean the employee is alone. It just means others cannot see or hear them. Thus, individuals working on the same job site as others but out of sight would qualify as lone workers. Here are a few other potential lone workers:

  • Workers who work alone while others take a break
  • Single employees working late
  • Employees working away from other employees but still in public or populated places
  • Employees travelling alone for business
  • Employees working from home.

Lone workers can be construction workers on a job site working alone, healthcare workers caring for patients at home, and social workers conducting home visits alone. They could also be someone working alone at the office after everyone else has gone home.

Working alone leaves an employee vulnerable. Plus, the law dictates that all businesses must adequately protect their lone workers. Here are a few of the ways you can maximise your lone workers’ safety.

1. Lone Worker Apps

Technology and smartphones have boosted the world of security for lone workers. Smartphone lone worker apps can give employers real-time information about an employee’s location and wellbeing.

For example, some apps have safety features like a ‘man-down’ alert or panic alarm. They can also include a timed check-in and discreet panic function.

Some of the newer smartphone apps connect to a Cloud-based monitoring hub that gives employers real-time updates. They can see, at a glance, where their employee is and if they’re relatively safe.

2. GPS tracker

GPS trackers also provide personal security for lone workers. These security devices give employers real-time information on their employees’ locations without compromising the privacy of a smartphone.

For example, the Prime 3G GPS tracker has a powerful, reliable tracking device that you can use for vehicle tracking, on high-risk / high-value assets in transit, or for lone worker security.

When a lone worker uses the tracker, they can alert up to three different people by SMS with the device’s SOS button.

A ‘geo-fence’ can also be defined around a specific geographical area, triggering an alert when the device leaves that area.

3. Panic alarm

If you don’t opt for the savvier trackers, a more simple security system for a lone worker is a panic alarm. Your workers will have personal security knowing they can push the panic alarm publicly or discreetly should they need to.

The panic alarm is especially helpful when your lone worker feels like they’re in a potentially dangerous situation and needs assistance. A discreet alarm works especially well when a lone worker feels threatened by someone and does not want to alert that person to the fact that help has been called.

4. Non-movement alarm

A non-movement alarm will sound after your employee has stopped moving for a given amount of time.

The lone worker device will detect accidents and medical emergencies in which the worker cannot hit a panic button.

5. Impact detection

Some man-down alarms will also have impact detection. This means the alarm will sound not only when the worker isn’t moving but also when the device sustains an impact.

If your worker is in an accident or falls from a height and cannot activate the panic alarm, the impact detection alarm will be triggered.

6. Training and communication

You can best prepare your lone workers for the dangers they may face by giving them adequate training regarding safety protocols. Train your lone workers in every possible scenario.

Implement a protocol where workers report near misses, as well. These are situations where individuals come close to having an accident, even when following current procedures. A near-miss report will give you the data necessary to review and revise current procedures and keep your lone workers safe.

Risk assessments for lone workers are essential. For example, social workers who enter homes alone should be able to identify red flags for potential risks. This type of basic risk assessment  will ultimately keep your lone workers safer.

Lone worker security made simple

Proper devices, training and protocols will help you maintain lone worker security in your business.

For advice and support relating to lone worker security, risk assessments and suitable devices, contact us at advice@esarisk.com, on +44 (0)343 515 8686 or via our contact form.

 

 

Bankruptcy restrictions for former footballer

Former professional footballer, Danny Guthrie, has been given six-year bankruptcy restrictions after choosing to repay gambling debts ahead of other creditors, while in the knowledge that he was insolvent.

Guthrie, who made more than 200 appearances in the Premier League and Football League for clubs including Newcastle United and Liverpool, borrowed £75,000 from a friend in 2019. He subsequently fell into £120,000 of gambling debt.

After making £160,000 from the sale of a property in August 2020, Guthrie “chose to repay his gambling debts ahead of other creditors by making several cash withdrawals despite knowing he was insolvent.”

Guthrie – now a coach with The Football Academy in Dubai – accepted a six-year bankruptcy undertaking, placing him under various restrictions. As a result, he cannot “borrow more than £500 without disclosing his bankrupt status”, nor can he “act as a company director without the court’s permission.”

The 35-year-old came through the youth teams at Manchester United and Liverpool before playing for a string of clubs in England, Indonesia and Iceland. He played four times for England Under-16s.

In relation to this case, the Official Receiver at the Insolvency Service, Kevin Read, said “Danny Guthrie’s actions were deliberate in dissipating assets, at a time he was already insolvent, and to the loss of his creditors. This extension of bankruptcy restrictions should serve as a warning that the Insolvency Service will take action to tackle such financial wrongdoing.”

Guthrie is not the first, nor the most high-profile former sportsperson to hit the headlines due to bankruptcy – this announcement comes only a few weeks after former tennis player Boris Becker was sentenced to two and a half years in prison for bankruptcy offences.

Guthrie’s bankruptcy undertaking runs until May 2028.

Insolvency and debt investigations

Seeing the whole picture in insolvency and debt cases is key to maximising returns to creditors. For more information on how ESA Risk can help to identify hidden assets or locate targets who have gone to ground, contact Mike Wright, Investigations and Risk Management Consultant, at mike.wright@esarisk.com, on +44 (0)343 515 8686 or via our contact form.

You can also learn more from our Insolvency & Debt Investigations brochure:

 

Latest judgment against director who abused Covid-19 support schemes

Ifraz Nabi ran New York Krispy Fried Chicken on Stockport Road, Greater Manchester, until its liquidation in November 2020. The insolvency process triggered an Insolvency Service investigation which uncovered Nabi’s abuse of the government’s Cvoid-19 support schemes.

Nabi’s business claimed £30,000 through the Eat Out to Help Out scheme and more than £20,000 through the Coronavirus Job Retention (furlough) Scheme. However, there was insufficient evidence of sales made during the qualifying period and “no explanation of how such sales could have been achieved while staff were on furlough.”

Additionally, the takeaway would not have qualified for Eat Out to Help Out funding, anyway, as the scheme was for restaurants with indoor seating and New York Krispy Fried Chicken had few indoor seats and received most of its orders through food delivery apps.

On top of his abuse of the pandemic relief schemes, Nabi did not register the business for tax and liquidators “were unable to assess how much the company owed in unpaid tax”. Nabi “admitted failing to maintain, preserve or deliver up adequate accounting records, as well as failing to register and account for VAT as required”, resulting in his disqualification from holding directorships for seven years. The disqualification is effective from 31st May 2022.

In relation to the case, the Insolvency Service’s Deputy Head of Investigations, Nina Cassar noted that “[o]ne of the main purposes of the Company Director’s Disqualification Act is to ensure that company directors adhere to minimum standards.” She warned that “the Insolvency Service will take action against those who abuse their position and do not take their obligations seriously.”

This is the latest Covid support scheme-related disqualification following an investigation by the Insolvency Service. It is no secret that millions of pounds from relief schemes were misappropriated by company directors – many more cases like this one will be uncovered as insolvency proceedings trigger further investigations in the future.

Fraud investigations by ESA Risk

If you suspect that a fraud has occurred within your business and need advice or support on the next steps, we’re here to help.

Contact Mike Wright, Risk Management & Investigations Consultant, at mike.wright@esarisk.com, on +44 (0)343 515 8686 or via our contact form to find out more.

Deep dive for the answers you need
Or contact us on +44 (0)343 515 8686 or at advice@esarisk.com.

Deep dive for the
answers you need

Lawyers, accountants, advisors, investors, senior
management. You name them, we help them find the answers
they need. Ready to discover how we can help you?